Follow us:
Subscribe to our newsletter or print magazine

logo

  • News
  • Projects
  • Business and Finance
  • Events
  • Products and Services
  • Online Magazine
  • Videos
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home
  • News
  • Projects
  • Business and Finance
  • Events
  • Products and Services
  • Online Magazine
  • Video
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Steel industry emissions to decline 30 per cent by 2050
  • Australia's mid-tier miners drive industry regeneration
  • WA State Budget highlights mining sector contributions
  • Steel-making coal starts to feel impact of decarbonisation and high prices
Quotes by TradingView

North Queensland Export Terminal responds to Court of Appeal win

02 Sep, 2021
304
North Queensland Export Terminal responds to Court of Appeal win
Image credit: The North Queensland Export Terminal.


The North Queensland Export Terminal (previously known as the Adani Abbot Point Terminal Pty Ltd) was in the Queensland Court of Appeal yesterday, appealing a decision made by the Supreme Court in August 2020 in relation to a contractual dispute regarding handling charges.

Located near Bowen in North Queensland, the North Queensland Export Terminal is a deep-water export terminal with a nameplate capacity of 50 million tonnes per annum. Adani acquired the 99-year leasehold of the terminal from the Queensland Government in 2011.

Eight mining companies have contracts in place to ship their product through the terminal. In August 2017, the North Queensland Export Terminal commenced proceedings against four of these companies, Lake Vermont Resources, QCoal, Byerwen Coal and Sonoma Mine, in the Queensland Supreme Court.

The claim brought by North Queensland Export Terminal in the Queensland Supreme Court related to a contractual dispute for the non-payment of terminal handling charges by the users. The users then brought a counter-claim alleging that North Queensland Export Terminal had engaged in unconscionable conduct.

 

Contractual dispute claim

The user companies disputed the 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 financial year handling charges passed through by North Queensland Export Terminal from the port operator on the basis that North Queensland Export Terminal had not demonstrated the charges are reasonable having regard to the efficient operation of the Terminal.

They have elected to not pay 50 per cent of the user charges billed to them over each of these four years. The proceeding concerned the 2018 and 2019 charges. North Queensland Export Terminal lead expert evidence and evidence from former employees of the Operator in support of why these port charges were reasonable.

 

Unconscionable conduct claim

In 2016, a former user of the port, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto (QCPL), elected to exit from its take or pay contract to ship nine million tonnes per annum of coal through the port until 2028.

The company entered into a legal agreement with North Queensland Export Terminal to assign its port capacity to a third party, Bravus Mining and Resources (formerly Adani Mining Pty Ltd) from July 2022 and to terminate its User Agreement with North Queensland Export Terminal.

In an arbitration award handed down in May 2019, former High Court judge Michael McHugh AC QC ruled that these arrangements were lawful and in accordance with the parties’ contractual arrangements. However, the four port user companies claimed that while legal, this agreement was unconscionable as it had the effect of increasing their port charges.

They argued the payment received by North Queensland Export Terminal from the former user should have been used to offset the amounts they are charged to use the port.

 

Recent Queensland Court of Appeal decision

The North Queensland Export Terminal’s appeal was successful in overturning the findings of the trial judge in respect of alleged unconscionable conduct and in relation to terminal handling charges.

“We are particularly pleased that the court has unanimously found that North Queensland Export Terminal did not engage in unconscionable conduct,” a North Queensland Export Terminal spokesperson said.

“We are also pleased that the decision on the 2018 and 2019 terminal handling charges is now resolved in our favour.”

“We look forward to the implementation of the orders of the Court of Appeal as we move forward with the operations of North Queensland Export Terminal.”

The full judgement can be accessed here: www.sclqld.org.au/caselaw/QCA/2021/187

Related Articles

Australian Crushing and Screening Equipment for Quarries and Mines

Digitalization in Mining North America

Resources and energy export earnings set for record $425 billion

MineGlow

all news all projects

Latest Posts

  • Latest News
  • Latest Projects
  • Tenders
19 May

Steel industry emissions to decline 30 per cent by 2050

19 May

Australia’s mid-tier miners drive industry regeneration

13 May

WA State Budget highlights mining sector contributions

10 May

Steel-making coal starts to feel impact of decarbonisation and high prices

03 May

Grok Ventures becomes AGL’s largest shareholder

12 May

Wodgina project in the Pilbara powers up with first lithium output

11 May

Core Lithium receives final lithium assays from 2021 drilling campaign

10 May

Vimy to resume drilling at Alligator River uranium project

04 May

Aircore highlights significant regional gold potential at Abercromby

04 May

Core Lithium receives environmental approval for BP33 mine

Not Stated   

Rio Tinto Naturescapes King Park Stage Two

Not Stated   

Bodangora Wind Farm

Not Stated   

Liquified Petroleum Gas

See All Tenders

Online Magazine

    Current Magazine Cover
  • Login
  • Subscribe

Subscribe

Subscribe to our email newsletter or print magazine.

Our Titles

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy
© Sage Media Group 2022 All Rights Reserved.
×
Authorization
  • Registration
 This feature has been disabled
 This feature has been disabled until further notice, however you may still register
×
Registration
  • Autorization
Register
* All fields required